Take, for instance, Mark 11 and John 2 when
Jesus encountered moneychangers in the temple and a righteous anger overcame
him. He was disgusted by the lack of reverence these people had for such holy
ground. So what did Jesus do? He made a whip. Scripture doesn’t say he snatched
a whip from a passerby; it doesn’t insinuate Jesus already owned a whip or that
his disciples provided him with one. Rather, Jesus took time to make that whip.
He set aside time to sit and reflect on whether or not he really wanted a table
flipping, harsh word-spewing tirade to go down in history. And he chose yes. He
chose righteous anger. I am willing to put big bucks on the odds that these
moneychangers did not feel a “love wins” kind of love that day.
And lest you think Jesus’ outburst was provoked
only this once, I think it prudent to mention some theologians believe the
incident in Mark and the one in John were actually two separate occurrences. Which
would mean two things: first, disobedient people (that’s all of us) are slow
learners, and second, Jesus used anger as a means of rebuking unrighteous
behavior. Why? Because Jesus is more concerned with our holiness than our
happiness. Because Jesus wants us to understand that when we pursue holiness we
are pursuing happiness. And because tough love is still love.
Swindlers in the temple
courts were not the only people to receive Jesus’ tough love. Jesus told his disciples
they had little faith when they feared for their lives during a storm—ouch. Can
you imagine leaving friends, family, and vocations to follow a man around the
Middle East and then that very man tells you to stop your whining and get some
more faith? Jesus also called Peter out on a sin Peter had not yet committed.
Jesus said something along the lines of, “You’re totally going to deny me.
Three times actually. But I still love you.”
Mary and Martha experienced
Jesus’ tough love after Lazarus’ death. Jesus was slow to arrive in Bethany, and
when He finally arrived, three days too late, he did not come bearing flowers,
a condolence card, or even comforting words. In fact, he reprimanded Mary and
Martha by saying, “I am the resurrection and the life. The one who
believes in me will live, even though they die; and whoever lives by believing
in me will never die. Do you believe this?” And later he reasserted, “Did I not
tell you that if you believe, you will see the glory of God?”
Clearly, in this passage, Jesus is not modeling a
“Love Wins” love. This is “tough love” Jesus. This is “I have a plan that’s
better than yours” Jesus. We know this to be true because scripture explicitly
says He loved Lazarus and that “Jesus wept” over his death. Maybe He wept
because of Martha and Mary’s doubt; perhaps He was overcome by their grief. Whatever
the reason, Jesus displayed his love in stern words and tears. Jesus didn’t always cry when He rebuked, but he always loved.
Then there’s the story of
the Samaritan woman at the well, the one with five husbands. I cannot read the
story without cringing just a little. For starters, scholars believe Jesus did
not have to go through Samaria to get to Northern Israel. Like every other Jew,
He could have taken the path along the eastern banks of the Jordan and avoided
Samaria altogether. But He didn’t. He chose the path less traveled, so to
speak, because He went looking for this woman. Jesus purposed his steps in
order to find the lost sheep, point out her sins, and encourage her to live a
more righteous life. And how does he encourage brokenness, repentance, and
conversion? He totally calls her out. He asks her to bring her husband, and
when she says she doesn’t have one, Jesus says, “You’ve had five husbands, and
the man you’re living with now is not your husband.” (Cue wincing now.)
Jesus called to light the darkness lurking in
the Samaritan woman’s past. He did it for the purpose of setting her free from
bondage. And it works. Maybe not immediately, because she challenges His
authority with some theological question, one beyond my understanding, about
where it’s most appropriate to worship God. Yet, within the same conversation, she juxtaposed two truths--I am a sinner and this holy man is offering me
cleansing water. She recognized her need for a savior. The Samaritan woman’s
worldview is challenged by Truth. And what else can one do when faced with the
reality of man’s depravity and God’s holiness? She accepted Jesus as Lord. With
abundant jubilation and celebration, the woman ran into town to share the good
news.
There are other examples of when Jesus loving passed judgment that come to mind; the story of Mary Magdalene is one of them. In this
passage, we tend to emphasis the grace component, which I believe is the banner
theme of the story. However, when we
focus exclusively on the “he without sin cast the first stone” part, we tend to
lose sight of the passage’s lynch pin. We let Jesus’ forgiveness overshadow His
call to righteousness: “go and sin no more.”
Our culture thinks it too judgmental to call sin “sin.” But
it was Jesus who said we could judge a tree by its fruit. How, then, can we
discern good fruit from bad fruit without judging? Calling Christians to a
standard of biblical righteousness is not the same as judging a person’s
salvation. That sort of judgment is scripturally forbidden. Speaking from
experience, I sure wish there had been people around when I was in my early
twenties who could have lovingly said, “Hey, knock that crap off. The Lord has a
better plan for you.”
Grace-filled Truth
I like what Tim Keller
recently wrote in reference to the importance of applying apologetics (the deep
understanding of scripture) and faith. He writes, “There will be no joy in the grace of Jesus unless people see
they're lost. Thus a gospel-shaped apologetic must not simply present
Christianity, it must also challenge the non-believer's worldview and show
where it, and they, have a real problem.”
Nonbelievers and believers alike,
we’ve all become quite cavalier with Jesus’ righteousness, and we choose to
focus instead on how loving He was. We’ve traded pursuing God’s holiness for
accepting cheap grace, and then we label it “love.” We’re so quick to throw
around phrases like, “don’t judge me” or “that’s just where I’m at.” And we
convince ourselves that our choices are just fine because after all, God is
love and Love Wins!... right?
So we don’t judge. We don’t even
“tolerate” anymore. Instead, we support. We rally around others’ hurts. We
affirm people that they are a whole and healthy person, that there is nothing
wrong or lacking about their life. And Truth gets lost in the shuffle. But how
loving is it to give people half truths? How transformative it that kind of
love?
Maybe you’ve heard people define justice, mercy,
and grace along these lines: Justice is getting what we deserve; mercy is not
getting what we deserve; grace is getting more than we deserve. Grace is what sets people free from
bondage. Not condemnation—never condemnation.
By the time
I reached my early twenties, I had lived so much life, and the baggage I
carried as a result was heavy and burdensome. I had been hurt by people I
should have been able to trust and by places that should have offered refuge:
father figures who were not faithful; father figures who walked out; a single
mother coping the best she knew how; a church that failed to teach me how to
bask in God’s grace. But some of my baggage was self-induced, and for that I
take ownership: pride, rebellion, entitlement, mistrust for authority, I could
keep going... I was and am and will always be a messy wreck. But I now know
where to run for refuge and cleansing. Because I need more than Love. I need a
Savior. I need Grace.
Grace is
the kind of love that covers a multitude of sins. It calls us a biblical standard
of righteousness while simultaneously extending love. Grace encompasses both
truth and love, and it is grace that prompts hearts to holiness. Ultimately,
Grace is what wins.
Winning
If I’m
correct in my assumption that “Love Wins” implies that Jesus is and was and
always will be an all-accepting softy who would never condemn anyone to Hell,
well, then that’s nothing short of blasphemy.
People of
all faiths and no faiths have to reconcile that Jesus says of himself in John
14:6, “I am the way, the truth and
the life. No one gets to the father except through the son.” Is there any other
way to interpret this verse other than “hey, sorry, but I, Lord Jesus, am the
only way to Heaven” ?
That Jesus
is the world’s only eternal savior is reiterated in John 3:16, which states,
“For God so loved the world that He gave His only son. Whoever believes in Him
will not perish but have everlasting life.”
Also in John, Jesus says, "God is a Spirit and they that worship Him must worship Him in
spirit and in truth."
Jesus’
disciples got it. In Acts Peter and John are asked by Sadducees by what power
they are able to perform healing miracles. Peter and John are embolden by the
Holy Spirit and proclaim that it is in the name of Jesus Christ, for there is
no other name by which men can be saved. Salvation is found in no one else.
Non-Christians
and nominal Christians often say that Jesus was a really good teacher, a role
model for sure, and they choose to focus solely on those facets of Jesus. This
perspective makes Jesus out to be a really nice guy who walked around loving
everyone, judging no one, and handing out free health care (as I recently read
in the caption on some polemical cartoon in support of Obama Care).
I like what
C.S. Lewis has to say about acknowledging the divinity of Christ. To
paraphrase, Lewis says that if we are going to lay claim to Jesus being a good
person or a good teacher, then we have to accept that He is Lord. Jesus says he
is Lord. Jesus says He is the only way to the Father God and Heaven. If Jesus
isn’t Lord, if He isn’t the only way to Heaven, then He’s either a lunatic or a
liar. And if He’s a lunatic or a liar, then He is without question a false
teacher and not someone worth emulating. But he can’t be all three. So I’m
going with Lord.
I haven’t
read Rob Bell’s book, so I can’t speak Bell's intention, only our culture's. I’m
sure in addition to all the Love and Winning there’s probably some good Truth
in his book. Although, it’s certainly worth asking the question: if something
is mostly true, does that still make it Truth? But honestly, this isn’t a
critique of Rob Bell or his book or even the silly Love Wins bumper sticker.
No, the
issue at hand is far bigger than that. As
the body of Christ, as the church, we need to challenge the perpetuated
misconception that an all loving Jesus will always make us feel good about ourselves.
The truth is: Truth doesn’t always affirm us; it doesn’t always make us feel
loved. But our obedience to Truth always produces fruit.
Love is
what draws people to Christ. Truth is what sanctifies us. Grace is what saves
us from ourselves.
God
designed it. Jesus paved the way. The Holy Spirit makes it possible.